Peculiarities of Communication with Residents and the Role of Social Media in Smart Cities

M. Kitsa

Abstract


The aim of the work is to outline the most effective communication channels with residents in smart cities.

Research methodology. Both theoretical and empirical research methods were used in the research process. The research methodology consisted of several stages. The first was a comprehensive literature review to understand the current state of knowledge in the fields of smart city development, social media, and urban communication. This involved analyzing existing studies, articles, and reports on how social media is used within smart cities for engaging with residents. The next was data collection. This method was used to build a dataset of types of communication with residents in smart cities. After collecting a dataset of posts in social media, we extract relevant features that can be used to provide effective communication between local authorities and audience. These features include the frequency of writing posts in social media, the types of answers and comments, the explaining of sensitive topics.

Results. It was found out that effective communication with residents in smart cities should include such features: the use of digital platforms for communication (such as mobile apps, social media, or online forums) have seen increased engagement from residents. This could manifest in higher participation rates in city surveys, community events, or feedback mechanisms. Also it was examined that effective communication channels can lead to higher resident satisfaction. This might be due to quicker responses to complaints, more efficient service delivery, or a greater sense of being heard and considered by city administrations.

Novelty. The novelty of this work is the proposed effective types of communication with residents in smart cities. For example, younger residents may prefer social media or apps, while older residents might rely on more traditional methods like community newsletters or public meetings. The next studies might also explore how communication technologies impact the social and cultural fabric of urban communities, possibly affecting community bonding, local culture preservation, and social inclusivity.

Practical meaning. Effective communication channels can lead to higher resident satisfaction. This might be due to quicker responses to complaints, more efficient service delivery, or a greater sense of being heard and considered by city administrations. Moreover, smart city communication strategies might be particularly effective in enhancing public safety. Quick dissemination of information regarding emergencies, health alerts, or public safety incidents can be a significant benefit.

Key words: social media, communication, audience, smart cities.


References


Al Ridhawi, I., Otoum, S., Aloqaily, M., Jararweh, Y., & Baker, T. (2020). Providing secure and reliable communication for next generation networks in smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 56, 102080 [in English].

Delmastro, F., Arnaboldi, V., & Conti, M. (2016). People-centric computing and communications in smart cities. IEEE Communications Magazine, 54 (7), 122–128 [in English].

Doran, D., Severin, K., Gokhale, S., & Dagnino, A. (2020). Social media enabled human sensing for smart cities. AI Communications, 29 (1), 57–75 [in English].

Ianuale, N., Schiavon, D., & Capobianco, E. (2015). Smart cities and urban networks: are smart networks what we need? Journal of Management Analytics, 2 (4), 285–294 [in English].

Kitsa, M. (2023). Telegram news channels: overview, audience preferences, specifics of functioning. Bulletin of Lviv Polytechnic National University: journalism, 2. Retrieved from URL:https://science.lpnu.ua/sites/default/files/journal-paper/2023/sep/31425/11.pdf [in English].

Molinillo, S., Anaya-Sánchez, R., Morrison, A. M., & Coca-Stefaniak, J. A. (2019). Smart city communication via social media: Analysing residents’ and visitors’ engagement. Cities, 94, 247–255 [in English].

Moreno-Ibarra, M., & Torres-Ruiz, M. (2019). Civic participation in smart cities: the role of social media. Proccedings of the Conference Smart cities: Issues and challenges. Elsevier [in English].

Petrikova, D., Jaššo, M., & Hajduk, M. (2020). Social Media as Tool of SMART City Marketing: The Role of Social Media Users Regarding the Management of City Identity. Smart Governance for Cities: Perspectives and Experiences, 55–72 [in English].

Rodriguez-Hernandez, M. A., Gomez-Sacristan, A., & Gomez-Cuadrado, D. (2019). Simulcity: Planning communications in smart cities. IEEE Access, 7, 46870–46884 [in English].

Yaqoob, I., Hashem, I. A. T., Mehmood, Y., Gani, A., Mokhtar, S., & Guizani, S. (2017). Enabling communication technologies for smart cities. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55 (1), 112–120 [in English].

Yuan, Y., Lu, Y., Chow, T. E., Ye, C., Alyaqout, A., & Liu, Y. (2021). The missing parts from social media-enabled smart cities: who, where, when, and what? Proccedings of the Conference «Smart Spaces and Places». London [in English].




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.32840/cpu2219-8741/2024.1(57).13

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Since 2013, all electronic versions of the journal are stored in the National Library of Ukraine named after VI Vernadsky of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and presented on the portal in the information resource "Scientific Periodicals of Ukraine".

Indexing of the journal in scientometric databases:

The publication is indexed by Citefactor: 2019/2020: 4,54.

The journal is indexed by Google Scholar.

In 2020, the journal was included in the Index Copernicus.

The journal is indexed by Innospace Scientific Journal Impact Factor (SJIF): 2016: 5,899, 2017: 6,435, 2018: 7,037, 2019: 7,431

From 2020, the collection is indexed by ResearchBib.

Journal included in the PKP Index.