Business Models of Scientific Journals: Global Trends and Ukrainian Realities
Abstract
The purpose of the research is to analyze the conceptual foundations of business models of scientific journals in the global and national contexts, including an analysis of global trends and current trends in Ukraine.
Research methodology. The methods of analysis, comparison, abstraction and generalisation were used. The method of analysis allowed us to consider in detail the main aspects and essence of the object of research – business models of scientific journals, to describe trends in the global market of scientific publishing, in particular, to show the dynamics of development of scientific journals and to identify the main trend – the transition to open access and open science. The method of comparison allowed us to distinguish between business strategies of scientific journals, which differ primarily in their purpose – commercial benefits or publication of high-quality research information, to compare current business models, highlighting the positive and negative aspects of their existence. The method of abstraction was important for highlighting the essential characteristics and fundamental features of individual business models, which made it possible to increase the comprehensibility of each of them, to provide a correct picture of the consequences of their application, relying only on the features of the models that are important from a practical point of view. The method of generalisation was used to draw conclusions about the impact of current business models of scientific journals on the quality of published scientific content, the development of scientific journalism and open science in general.
Results. The authors have studied the main business models of scientific journals that have been formed to date; these are the traditional (subscription), Open Access, hybrid and so-called «predatory» models, which are widely used, but can contribute to the dissemination of low-quality scientific information, contain unfounded conclusions and false correlations. The authors summarize the main trends in the global market of scientific publication services, and outline the trends and realities of Ukrainian scientific publications.
As business models are changing rapidly under the influence of digitalisation, this paper highlights the innovations and challenges faced by scientists in sharing scientific information in the digital environment, focuses on the importance of developing open access in the context of establishing cooperation among scientists and improving the quality of scientific content, and highlights the risks posed by the development of the predatory journal model.
Thus, the article compares the business models of scientific journals, focusing on those that are promising or, on the contrary, harmful to the further development of scientific research, and summarises the current changes in the field of scientific journals – the gradual transition to open access journals, as well as the negative trends of today – the spread of ‘predatory’ journals against the background of the high cost and complexity of publishing in bona fide journals, the motives of scientists who turn to «predatory» scientific publications.
The novelty. The conceptual foundations of business models of scientific journals in global and national contexts, including global trends and current trends in Ukraine, are analyzed.
Practical significance. This work is an important contribution to the formation of the conceptual framework for the development of business models of domestic scientific journals in the context of digitalization and changing global trends, which is valuable for scientists, scientific publications, their employees, editors and reviewers, as well as other users of scientific information.
Key words: research activities, scientific publication, scientific journals, indexing, global scientific community, Open Access, «predatory» publications, business models.
Full Text:
PDF (Українська)References
Zhenchenko, M. I. (2016). Cyfrovi transformacii' modelej vydannja naukovoi' periodyky [Digital transformations of scientific periodicals publishing models]. Poligrafija i vydavnycha sprava, 1, 257–266. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Pivs_2016_1_29 / [in Ukrainian].
Jaroshenko, T. (2021). Vidkrytyj dostup, vidkryta nauka, vidkryti dani: jak ce bulo i kudy jdemo: (do 20-littja Budapeshts'koi' iniciatyvy Vidkrytogo dostupu) [Open Access, Open Science, Open Data: How It Was and Where We Are Going: (to the 20th Anniversary of the Budapest Open Ac-cess Initiative)]. Ukrai'ns'kyj zhurnal z bibliotekoznavstva ta informacijnyh nauk, 8, 10–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7654.8.2021.247582 [in Ukrainian].
Fijalka, S. B. (2021). Model' fahovoi' komunikacii' za poserednyctvom naukovogo zhurnalu [Mod-el of professional communication through a scientific journal]. Obrii' drukarstva, 1-2 (9-10), 87–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20535/2522-1078.2021.1(9).240613 [in Ukrainian].
Fijalka, S. B. (2018). Hyzhac'ki zhurnaly jak zagroza dlja nauky, naukovoi' komunikacii' ta avtors'koi' reputacii' [Predatory journals as a threat to science, scientific communication and au-thor's reputation]. Current Issues of Mass Communication, 24, 33–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2312-5160.2018.24.33-40 [in Ukrainian].
Didenko, Ju. V. (2020). Onovlennja osnovnyh dokumentiv z pytan' funkcionuvannja naukovogo periodychnogo vydannja u NAN Ukrai'ny – chergovyj krok do pidvyshhennja i'hn'ogo rivnja [Up-dating the main documents on the functioning of scientific periodicals in the NAS of Ukraine – another step towards improving their level]. Nauka Ukrai'na v global'nomu informacijnomu prostori, 17, 65–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/akademperiodyka.422.065 [in Ukrainian].
Cassella, M., Calvi, L. (2009). New journal models and publishing perspectives in the evolving digital environment. Proceedings of the World Library and Information Congress: 75th IFLA Gen-eral Conference and Assembly “Libraries create futures: Building on cultural heritage” (Italy, Mi-lan, 23–27 August 2009). Retrieved from http://eprints.rclis.org/bitstream/10760/13508/1/cassella-IFLA2009.pdf [in English].
Baffy, G., Burns, M., Hoffmann, B. et al. (2020). Scientific Authors in a Changing World of Scholarly Communication: What Does the Future Hold? The American Journal of Medicine, 133, 26–31. DOI: doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.07.028 [in English].
Fiala, J., Mareš, J., Šesták, J. (2017). Reflections on how to evaluate the professional value of scientific papers and their corresponding citations. Scientometrics, 112 (1), 697–709. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2334-x [in English].
Official website of the Directory of Open Access Journals. Retrieved from https://doaj.org/ [in English].
Optima (Open practices, transparency and integrity for modern higher education) (2023). Vidkryti naukovi praktyky [Open Research Practices]. Lviv [in Ukrainian].
Transparent ranking: Institutional Repositories by Google Scholar (March 2024). Retrieved from https://repositories.webometrics.info/en/institutional [in English].
News & Views: Market Sizing Update 2023 / Delta Think OA Market Sizing, October 2023. Re-trieved from https://deltathink.com/news-views-market-sizing-update-2023/ [in English].
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.32840/cpu2219-8741/2024.3(59).12
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Since 2013, all electronic versions of the journal are stored in the National Library of Ukraine named after VI Vernadsky of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and presented on the portal in the information resource "Scientific Periodicals of Ukraine".
Indexing of the journal in scientometric databases:
The publication is indexed by Citefactor: 2019/2020: 4,54.
The journal is indexed by Google Scholar.
In 2020, the journal was included in the Index Copernicus.
The journal is indexed by Innospace Scientific Journal Impact Factor (SJIF): 2016: 5,899, 2017: 6,435, 2018: 7,037, 2019: 7,431
From 2020, the collection is indexed by ResearchBib.
Journal included in the PKP Index.