Еuropean Standards of Ethical Principles in Journalism

N. Kodatska, О. Oblasova, О. Tsvietaieva

Abstract


Purpose. The study aims to analyze modern European ethical standards in journalism, determine their role in shaping professional norms, review the ethical dilemmas and challenges faced by media professionals in adhering to these standards, and develop recommendations for improving the system of ethical regulation in the media sector.

Research methodology. The study employs the normative-legal analysis method to examine international documents and ethical codes from various European countries that define the ethical principles of journalists’ conduct. A comparative method is also applied to identify commonalities and differences in national and international standards of journalistic ethics.

Results. The research reviews the theoretical foundations and current state of European ethical standards in journalism. A comparative analysis of the key principles of ethical codes in European countries and the Code of Ethics for Ukrainian Journalists was conducted. Key trends in the development of ethical norms in contemporary European media practices were identified. An analysis of dilemmas and challenges journalists face when adhering to ethical standards was carried out. The study found that journalistic codes of ethics across European countries share many similarities due to their focus on protecting democratic values and freedom of expression. However, cultural, legal, and social differences account for variations in regulatory approaches. To enhance the effectiveness of ethical regulation, the study recommends further harmonization of standards, with particular attention to the challenges posed by the digital era and the threats of spreading misinformation.

The research suggests implementing ethical models for Ukrainian media outlets that consider the features of the contemporary European media environment, characterized by a combination of technological innovation, cultural diversity, and global challenges. Such models could aid in adapting Ukrainian ethical standards to current realities and increasing public trust in the media as an institution.

The study developed recommendations to improve the system of ethical regulation in journalism. These recommendations focus on harmonization, enhancing efficiency, and adapting ethical regulation to contemporary challenges. Their implementation is expected to increase trust in the media, strengthen democratic institutions, and foster the development of journalism as an independent societal institution.

Novelty. The study reveals the fundamental principles of ethical codes in various European countries and identifies trends in the changing ethical landscape of journalism in response to the development of digital technologies. It also proposes new ethical models that take into account the specifics of the modern media environment.

Practical significance. The findings of the study can be used to develop and refine internal ethical codes for media organizations given the adherence to European standards enhances the reputation of media outlets among audiences and partners. High-quality journalism that meets European ethical standards is also a crucial factor in media competitiveness in the marketplace.

Key words: European standards of journalistic ethics, ethical principles in journalism, combating misinformation, national ethical codes, media digitalization.


References


Zhurnalistska etyka [Journalistic ethics]. (2014). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Kutovenko, O. (2014). Manipuliatsii v novynakh ta inshi etychni vyklyky dlia ukrainskykh zhurnalistiv [Manipulation in the news and other ethical challenges for Ukrainian journalists]. Retrieved from http://surl.li/uujoxr [in Ukrainian].

Pocheptsov, H. (2022). Toksychnyi infoprostir. Yak zberehty yasnist myslennia i svobodu dii [Toxic infospace. How to maintain clarity of thinking and freedom of action]. Kharkiv: Vivat [in Ukrainian].

Standarty Rady Yevropy u sferi media: Zakonodavchyi biuleten. Kyiv [Council of Europe Media Standards: Legislative Bulletin]. (2005). Kyiv. Retrieved from https://old.archives.gov.ua/ International/ R_E_final.pdf. [in Ukrainian].

Bessarab, А., Volynets, G., Kodatska, N., Mykytiv, H., & Ostrovska, N. (2023). Тhe development of critical thinking and fact-checking as a basis for shaping the media culture and psychological health of modern youth. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research AD ALTA, 13, 115–119 [in English].

McQuail, D. (2010). Media accountability and freedom of publication. Oxford : Oxford University Press [in English].

International federation of journalists. (2019). Global charter of ethics for journalists [in English].

Lönnendonker, J. (2015). Media accountability and transparency in Europe. Cham: Springer [in English].

Singer, J. (2022). Ethical challenges in digital journalism. Cham: Springer [in English].

Kayser-Bril, N. (2020). Journalism, truth, and the restoration of trust in democracy. Cham: Springer [in English].

Patrick Lee, P. (2018). Journalism ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://oxfordre.com/ communication/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-89 [in English].

The ethics of journalism: Individual, institutional and cultural influences. (2014). Oxford: Reuters Institute [in English].

Bivins, T. (2015). Deon and telos in journalism ethics. Oxford: Oxford Academic [in English].

Trust in media and journalism. (2017). Springer research studies. Cham: Springer [in English].

Media accountability and transparency project. (2015). Media Accountability in Europe. Retrieved from https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/244147/reporting [in English].




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.32840/cpu2219-8741/2024.4(60).6

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Since 2013, all electronic versions of the journal are stored in the National Library of Ukraine named after VI Vernadsky of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and presented on the portal in the information resource "Scientific Periodicals of Ukraine".

Indexing of the journal in scientometric databases:

The publication is indexed by Citefactor: 2019/2020: 4,54.

The journal is indexed by Google Scholar.

In 2020, the journal was included in the Index Copernicus.

The journal is indexed by Innospace Scientific Journal Impact Factor (SJIF): 2016: 5,899, 2017: 6,435, 2018: 7,037, 2019: 7,431

From 2020, the collection is indexed by ResearchBib.

Journal included in the PKP Index.