Contemporary Philosophical Conceptions of Technology in the Context of the Dynamics of Civilizations

I. Bondarenko

Abstract


Research methodology. The purpose of this research is to identify the main philosophical approaches to the phenomenon of technology. This research strategy relies on the general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis as well as modelling by analogy to reconstruct objective and systematic conceptualization of technology as a multiaspectual fact of human intelligence and creativity, social dynamics and regress.

Results. This study looks at the emergence of the philosophy of technology as a new scientific paradigm. The main focus is on the taxonomy of this branch of philosophy that represents the dynamics of recognizing technology as a social and cultural phenomenon. This research finds that technology has been an important and ubiquitous factor of social reality and a subject sui generis of philosophical reflection since the mid-20th century. It was at this time that humanization of the concept of technology took place and the construction of social technology united under its umbrella different facts of public policies, efficient state formation, global communication, modern education, medicine and smart design. This study also aims to identify different taxonomic levels of the philosophy of technology. The first level represents systematic knowledge about technology as a specific result of human culture whereas the second one comprises reflection on consequences of the technological dynamics of civilization and suggests an algorithm of preventative measures for adaptation of individuals and nature to modern technogenic life. As for the third level, it codifies research related to engineering, innovation, design and production.

Novelty. This research introduces methodological findings of such foreign researchers of the philosophy of technology as J. Agassi, G. Böhme, А. Feenberg, С. Mitcham, F. Rapp, М. Wartofsky, whose concepts have remained unfamiliar to Ukrainian scientists, into the context of the national social communication science. 

The practical significance. The findings may be used as a methodological model for further research in the applied science. They may also promote the formation of transdisciplinary theory in the study of social communication technologies.

Key words: dispositive, communication, technology, applied communication technology, social technology, taxonomy, philosophy of technology.


References


Hromosiak, N. (2014). Philosophy of science and technology. Retrieved from: http://elartu. tntu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/18501/2/Mig_nauk_conf_2016_Hromosyak_N-The_philosophy _of_science_24.pdf. (in Ukrainian).

Economic Encyclopedia: іn three volumes. (2000) / Redecorated: S. V. Moherny (еd.). Kyiv, 1 (in Ukrainian).

Podshyvalkina V. I. (еd.). (2015). Social technology: for what? how? with what result? Оdessa. (in Ukrainian).

Philosophy of technology: history and modernity. (1997). Moscow. (in Russian).

Böhme, G. (2012). Invasive Technification: Critical Essays in the Philosophy of Technology. Bloomsbury Publishing. Retrieved from: //books.google.com.ua/books?id=AXY8CwAAQBAJ&pg= PR4&lpg=PR4&dq=Invasive+Technologie:+Technikphilosophie+und+Technikkritik&. (in English).

Jonas, Н. (1979). Toward a Philosophy of Technology. Hastings Center Report, 34–44. Retrieved from: https://greatbooksojai.com/Hans-Jonas-Toward-a-Philosophy-of-Technology.pdf. (in English).

Kyrre-Friis, J., Selinger, E. & Riis, S. (2009). New Waves in Philosophy of Technology. Palgrave Macmillan. (in English).

Mitcham, С. (1994). Thinking through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy. Retrieved from: https://archive.org/stream/Thinking ThroughTechnology-ThePathBetweenEngineeringAndPhilosophy. (in English).

Philosophy of Technology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from: https://plato. stanford.edu/entries/technology/. (in English).

Philosophy of Technology. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from: https://www.iep.utm.edu/¬technolo/#H2. (in English).

Rapp, F. (1981). Analytical Philosophy of Technology; translated by Stanley R. Carpenter and Theodor Langenbruch Dordrecht, Holland; Boston : D. Reidel ; Hingham, MA : Sold and distributed in the U.S.A. and Canada by Kluwer Boston. Retrieved from: https://books.google. com.ua/books?id=B1hgBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA21&lpg=PA21&dq=Analytical+Philosophy+of+Technology. (in English).

Rapp, F. (1989): Introduction: General perspectives on the complexity of philosophy of technology. Durbin, P.T. (Ed.). Philosophy of Technology: Practical, Historical and Other Dimensions, Dordrecht. Kluwer Academic Publishers, ix–xxiv. (in English).

Skolimowski, Н. (1996). The Structure of Thinking in Technology. Technology and Culture, 7, 3, 371–383. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3101935. (in English).

The Confession of the Flesh (1977) interview (1980). Power / Knowledge Selected Interviews and Other Writings (1972–1977) Michel Foucault (ed Colin Gordon). New York, 194–228. (in English).

Wartofsky, M. W. (1979) Philosophy of technology. Asquith, P.D. & Kyburg, H.E. (еds). Current Research in Philosophy of Science, East Lansing (MI): Philosophy of Science Association,

–184. (in English).

Wartofsky, M. W. (1992). Technology, Power, and Truth: Political and Epistemological Reflections on the Fourth Revolution, Democracy. Technological Society, 15–34. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-017-1219-4_2. (in English).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Since 2013, all electronic versions of the journal are stored in the National Library of Ukraine named after VI Vernadsky of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and presented on the portal in the information resource "Scientific Periodicals of Ukraine".

Indexing of the journal in scientometric databases:

The publication is indexed by Citefactor: 2019/2020: 4,54.

The journal is indexed by Google Scholar.

In 2020, the journal was included in the Index Copernicus.

The journal is indexed by Innospace Scientific Journal Impact Factor (SJIF): 2016: 5,899, 2017: 6,435, 2018: 7,037, 2019: 7,431

From 2020, the collection is indexed by ResearchBib.

Journal included in the PKP Index.