Social Networks as Catalysts of Democratic Processes in Society
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to conduct a detailed scientific and practical substantiation of the features of social networks as catalysts for democratic processes in society due to modern conditions in the framework of globalization processes.
Research methodology. The study used general scientific (generalization, comparison, induction and deduction) and empirical-theoretical methods (analysis, synthesis). The use of system-structural and statistical analysis made it possible to differentiate the main ratings of social network platforms, the number of social network users for the period 2012–2022 and the penetration of social networks by region in January 2022. Based on the survey, it was determined which social network citizens of Ukraine use to receive news.
Results. It is determined that social networks are becoming a global phenomenon of communication and are developing independently and in an extremely dynamic environment of new innovative technologies. It is established that social networks are a segment of communication and socialization, which influences the formation of new social structures. It is determined that social networks are part of the public discourse, which allows to directly and publicly respond to political processes in society, which opens the possibility of political influence. The analysis found that the use of social networks is far from evenly distributed around the world, and the total number of social network users around the world has almost doubled from 1.48 billion in 2012 to 4.62 billion in 2022.
Novelty. The scientific novelty of the results obtained in the article is due to the solution of an important scientific problem, which is to develop theoretical principles and practical recommendations for analyzing the features of social networks as catalysts for democratic processes in society. The article further develops the study on the main indicators of the spread of social networks in the global and national dimensions.
Practical significance. The results of the study can be used in the study of the scientific field of «Social Communications». The results can be directed to further research of social networks as catalysts of democratic processes in society.
Key words: social networks, catalysts, democratic processes, society.
Full Text:
PDF (Українська)References
Naiem, M. (2014). Frensis Fukuiama: Putin robyt rivno te same, shcho robyv Hitler [Francis Fukuyama: Putin is doing exactly what Hitler did]. Ukrainska pravda. Retrieved from https://www.pravda.com.ua/articles/2014/08/27/7035903/ [in Ukrainian].
Rudenko, A. F. (2018). Sotsialni merezhi yak efektyvnyi zasib hromadskoi samoorhanizatsii v suchasnii Ukraini [Social networks as an effective means of public self-organization in modern Ukraine]. Retrieved from http://old2.niss.gov.ua/content/articles/files/Rudenko-52ea7.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Almond, G., & Verba, S. (2000). Civilna kultura: politički stavovi i demokracija u pet zemalja. Zagreb: Politička kultura [in Croatian].
Borja, J., & Castells, M. (1997). Local and Global: The Management of Cities in the Information Age. London: Earthscan [in English].
Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers [in English].
Digital 2022 Global Overview Report. (2020). The essential guide to the world’s connected behaviours Global Overview Report Digital 2022. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/ DataReportal/digital-2022-global-overview-report-january-2022-v02 [in English].
Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press [in English].
Global WebIndex. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.gwi.com/ [in English].
Kemp, S. (2019). Digital 2019: Global digital overview. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/ reports/digital-2019-global-digital-overview [in English].
Kutsyk, A., & Golovei, V. (2020). Social Networks as a Factor in the Development of Civil Society in Ukraine. European Journal of Tranformation Studies, 8 (1), 109–125 [in English].
Maldini, P. (2011). Politička kultura i demokratska tranzicija u Hrvatskoj. Dubrovnik: Sveučilište u Dubrovniku [in English].
Maldini, P. (2016). Network Society and Democracy: How ICT Mediated Communication and Virtual Socialization Affects Political Participation. Department of Communication Science, University of Dubrovnik, Ulica branitelja Dubrovnika 29. Dubrovnik [in Croatian].
Modrzejewski, A., (2018). European Identity of the Orthodox World in the Historiosophical Thought of Karol Wojtyla – John Paul II. In Southeast Europe: History, Culture, Politics, and Economy. Proceedings of International Conference, 70–76 [in English].
Putnam, R. (2003). Kako demokraciju učiniti djelotvornom: Civilne tradicije u modernoj Italiji. Zagreb: Fakultet političkih znanosti Sveučilišta u Zagrebu [in Croatian].
Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and Homogeneity- heterogeneity. Global Modernities London: Sage Publications [in English].
Samus, A. (2016). Specyfika vysvitlennya revolyuciyi gidnosti u blogach amerykanskych ta ukrayinskych zhurnalistiv, Molodyj vchenyj, 1 (28), 2. Retrieved from http://molodyvcheny.in.ua/files/journal/2016/1/74.pdf [in English].
Simmel, G. (1971). On Individuality and Social Forms. Chicago: University of Chicago [in English].
USAID-Internews Media Consumption Survey. (2020). Retrieved from https://internews.org/wp-content/uploads/legacy/2020-10/2020-Media-Consumption-Survey-FULL-FIN-Eng.pdf [in English].
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.32840/cpu2219-8741/2022.1(49).10
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Since 2013, all electronic versions of the journal are stored in the National Library of Ukraine named after VI Vernadsky of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and presented on the portal in the information resource "Scientific Periodicals of Ukraine".
Indexing of the journal in scientometric databases:
The publication is indexed by Citefactor: 2019/2020: 4,54.
The journal is indexed by Google Scholar.
In 2020, the journal was included in the Index Copernicus.
The journal is indexed by Innospace Scientific Journal Impact Factor (SJIF): 2016: 5,899, 2017: 6,435, 2018: 7,037, 2019: 7,431
From 2020, the collection is indexed by ResearchBib.
Journal included in the PKP Index.