Transformation of Journalistic Autonomy in the Context of Media Space Algorithmization: a Theoretical Discourse
Abstract
Article’s purpose is to provide a comprehensive theoretical comprehension and actualization of the factor of a journalist's professional autonomy under the conditions of intensive implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies.
Research methodology. The study employs the method of theoretical analysis and synthesis to systematize scientific perspectives on the problem of journalistic independence. Additionally, a comparative method is used to contrast classical content production models with new practices mediated by AI. For the analysis of ethical challenges and strategies for regulating the use of algorithms in journalism.
Results. This scientific study is dedicated to a comprehensive analysis of the impact of generative artificial intelligence on the professional independence of media specialists.
In the article it has been established that under the conditions of algorithmization, journalistic autonomy ceases to be an isolated category and acquires a relational character. Professional independence is now determined not only by internal editorial rules but also by interaction with the global socio-technical infrastructure, technical frameworks, and platforms. Within this context, journalistic agency becomes a dynamic phenomenon that depends on the policies of technology corporations that control the algorithms.
The research revealed a significant shift in the boundaries of professional identity due to the emergence of the «functional agency» of artificial intelligence systems. It shows that algorithms increasingly function as «communicative agents» that influence editorial decisions and the story-creation process. The delegation of routine tasks to machines leads to a blurring of the boundaries of responsibility between humans and algorithms. Despite the high speed of data processing, AI systems lack the refinement of judgment, deep understanding of context, and moral responsibility required for high-quality journalism, leaving the human with the central role in content production.
The study substantiates the necessity of transitioning to a «controlled change» model in editorial policy. This concept posits that journalists should not passively adopt technologies but should actively define the conditions and limits of AI utilization while maintaining control over the final product.
Novelty.The work analyses the specifics of journalist work autonomy. Also in the article provides a first-time conceptualization of the challenges regarding the algorithmization of the media space, framing them not merely as a technical issue but as a threat to the displacement of the media professional's identity within the Ukrainian reality.
The practical significance. The research results can be used during the further study of journalism autonomy, implementation AI tools in media work.
Key words: autonomy, artificial intelligence, algorithmic challenges, editorial independence, media ethics.Full Text:
PDF (Українська)References
Hrozna, O. (2024). Tekhnolohichni innovatsii v onlain-media: rol shtuchnoho intelektu ta virtu-alnoi realnosti u transformatsii kontentu [Technological innovations in online media: the role of artificial intelligence and virtual reality in content transformation]. Obrii drukarstva, 1 (15), 102–112 [in Ukrainian].
KZhE. Rekomendatsiyi Komisiyi z zhurnalistsʹkoyi etyky shchodo vykorystannya shtuchnoho intelektu dlya stvorennya zhurnalistskykh materialiv [Recommendations of the Commission on Journalistic Ethics on the use of artificial intelligence to create journalistic materials]. Re-trieved from https://surl.li/evpbkz [in Ukrainian].
Myronenko, V., & Hlazunov, O. (2025). Rol instrumentiv shtuchnoho intelektu v suchasnomu masmediinomu dyskursi Ukrainy [The role of artificial intelligence tools in modern mass media discourse in Ukraine]. Masova komunikatsiia u hlobalnomu ta natsionalnomu vymirakh, 14, 14–17 [in Ukrainian].
Romanchuk, O. (2018). Shtuchnyy intelekt v epokhu novykh mediy [Artificial intelligence in the era of new media]. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Seriya Zhurnalistyka, 44, 179–188 [in Ukrainian].
Yablonska, N. (2017). Shtuchnyy intelekt ta mas-media: vyklyky dlya pidhotovky zhurnalistiv [Artificial intelligence and mass media: challenges for training journalists]. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Seriya Zhurnalistyka, 42, 95–101 [in Ukrainian].
Yaroshenko, O. (2024). Shtuchnyy intelekt u zhurnalistytsi: maybutnye media pid vplyvom no-vykh tekhnolohiy [Artificial intelligence in journalism: the future of media under the influence of new technologies]. Naukovi zapysky Instytutu zhurnalistyky, 2 (85), 139–156 [in Ukrainian].
Bodker, H. (2022). Journalistic autonomy: The genealogy of a concept. H. Örnebring & M. Karlsson (Eds.). Missouri: The University of Missouri Press. Retrieved from https://surl.li/qvfgol [in English].
Campbell, Ch., Chow, A., & Perrigo, B. (2025). The architects of AI are TIME’s 2025 person of the year. Retrieved from https://time.com/7339685/person-of-the-year-2025-ai-architects/ [in English].
Dierickx, L. Rethinking core journalism skills in the age of AI. Retrieved from https://ohmybox.info/rethinking-core-journalism-skills-in-the-age-of-ai/ [in English].
Dodds, T., Yeung, W., Mellado, C.l., & Lima-Santos, M. (2025). On controlled change: Gen-erative AI's impact on professional authority in journalism. Retrieved from https://surl.lu/vgjkuz [in English].
González-Arias, C., Chatzikoumi, E., & López-García, X. (2024). The anthropomorphic pursuit of AI-generated journalistic texts: Limits to expressing subjectivity. Front. Commun. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/communication/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1456509/full [in English].
Goodson, K., Barchas-Lichtenstein, J., Jens, S., Wright, E., & Gandhi, U. Journalism’s new frontier: An analysis of global AI policy proposals and their impacts on journalism. Retrieved from https://surl.li/hmaohg [in English].
Kuai, J., & Thompson, T. (2025). Rethinking journalistic autonomy in the algorithmic era: To-ward context-aware, value-driven, and human-centred research into journalistic AI. Communi-cation Research and Practice, 11 (3). Retrieved from https://surl.li/qkijrp [in English].
Kuai, J., Lin, B., Karlsson, M., & Lewis, S. C. (2023). From wild east to forbidden city: Mapping algorithmic news distribution in China through a case study of Jinri Toutiao. Digital Journalism, 11 (8), 1521–1541. Retrieved from https://surl.lu/wnfgoa [in English].
Leonard, B. (2010). Department of defense dictionary of military and associated terms as amended through april 2010. DIANE Publishing. Retrieved from https://surl.li/jcbvnp [in English].
Mallick, P. K. (2000). Military media relation in today’s warfare. Combat Journal, September, 2. Retrieved from https://surl.li/htvkva [in English].
Dodds, T., Yeung, W., Mellado, C., & de Lima-Santos, M.-F. (2025). On controlled change: Generative AI’s impact on professional authority in journalism. Retrieved from https://surl.li/pofwcp [in English].
Paris charter on AI and journalism. Retrieved from https://surl.li/jlmeop [in English].
Türk, V. (2025). Journalism facing new threats from AI and censorship. UN news. Retrieved from https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/05/1162856 [in English].
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.32840/cpu2219-8741/2025.4(64).4
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Since 2013, all electronic versions of the journal are stored in the National Library of Ukraine named after VI Vernadsky of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and presented on the portal in the information resource "Scientific Periodicals of Ukraine".
Indexing of the journal in scientometric databases:
The publication is indexed by Citefactor: 2019/2020: 4,54.
The journal is indexed by Google Scholar.
In 2020, the journal was included in the Index Copernicus.
The journal is indexed by Innospace Scientific Journal Impact Factor (SJIF): 2016: 5,899, 2017: 6,435, 2018: 7,037, 2019: 7,431
From 2020, the collection is indexed by ResearchBib.
Journal included in the PKP Index.